Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), total alkalinity and other hydrographic and chemical variables collected from discrete samples and profile observations during the CCGS Amundsen cruise BaySys2010 (EXPOCODE 18DL20100721) in the Hudson Bay from 2010-07-21 to 2010-07-30 (NCEI Accession 0209350)
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION: This dataset includes discrete profile measurements of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), total alkalinity, temperature and salinity during the CCGS Amundsen cruise BaySys2010 (EXPOCODE 18DL20100721) in the Hudson Bay from 2010-07-21 to 2010-07-30. The cruise was funded by the Canadian ArcticNET project as part of the BaySys2010 cruise.
CITE AS: Miller, Lisa A.; Davelaar, Marty; Burt, William J. (2020). Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), total alkalinity and other hydrographic and chemical variables collected from discrete samples and profile observations during the CCGS Amundsen cruise BaySys2010 (EXPOCODE 18DL20100721) in the Hudson Bay from 2010-07-21 to 2010-07-30 (NCEI Accession 0209350). [indicate subset used]. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25921/dfkg-9968. Accessed [date].
Discrete measurement;
TEMPORAL COVERAGE:
SPATIAL COVERAGE:
GEOGRAPHIC NAMES:
PLATFORMS:
RESEARCH PROJECT(S):
VARIABLES / PARAMETERS:
Dissolved Inorganic Carbon | |
---|---|
Abbreviation: | TCARBN |
Unit: | UMOL/KG |
Observation type: | Discrete, bottle |
Measured or calculated: | Measured |
Sampling instrument: | Niskin Bottles |
Analyzing instrument: | Coulometer, SOMMA1 |
Detailed sampling and analyzing information: | 500mL glass bottles, preserved with 100 microliters of HgCl2, glass stoppers sealed with elastic and plastic clips. Stored in the dark at 4C and analyzed ashore. Total inorganic carbon and alkalinity were both analyzed from the same bottle. Flag: 1001-064-23, Large difference between replicates. |
Replicate information: | 1% of samples collected in replicate |
Standardization description: | reference solution |
Standardization frequency: | Daily |
CRM manufacturer: | Andrew Dickson Laboratory at SIO |
CRM batch number: | 101 |
Preservation method: | Mercuric chloride solution |
Preservative volume: | 100 μL |
Preservative correction: | (known standard value/measured standard value) X analyzed sample value X 1.0002 (HgCl2 correction) |
Uncertainty: | 0.85 μmol kg-1 |
Quality flag convention: | WOCE quality control flags are used: 2 = good value, 3 = questionable value, 4 = bad value |
Method reference: | Dickson, A.G., Sabine, C.L. and Christian, J.R. (Eds.) 2007. Guide to best practices for ocean CO2 measurements. PICES Special Publication 3, 191 pp. |
Researcher name: | Lisa Miller |
Researcher institution: | Institute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada |
Total alkalinity | |
---|---|
Abbreviation: | ALKALI |
Unit: | UMOL/KG |
Observation type: | Discrete, bottle |
Measured or calculated: | Measured |
Sampling instrument: | Niskin Bottles |
Analyzing instrument: | potentiometric titrator, IOS1 |
Type of titration: | Potentiometric |
Cell type (open or closed): | Open |
Curve fitting method: | Non-linear least squares using Labview |
Detailed sampling and analyzing information: | 500mL glass bottles, preserved with 100 microliters of HgCl2, glass stoppers sealed with elastic and plastic clips. Stored in the dark at 4C and analyzed ashore. Total inorganic carbon and alkalinity were both analyzed from the same bottle. Flag: 1001-061-23, Large difference between replicates. |
Replicate information: | 1% of samples collected in replicate |
Standardization description: | reference solution |
Standardization frequency: | Daily |
CRM manufacturer: | Certified Reference Material (Dr. Andrew Dickson, Marine Physical Laboratory, La Jolla, California) |
CRM batch number: | CRM batch 101 |
Preservation method: | Mercuric chloride |
Preservative volume: | 100 μL |
Preservative correction: | (known standard value/measured standard value) X analyzed sample value X 1.0002 (HgCl2 correction) |
Uncertainty: | 1.7 μmol/kg |
Quality flag convention: | WOCE quality control flags are used: 2 = good value, 3 = questionable value, 4 = bad value |
Method reference: | Dickson, A.G., Sabine, C.L. and Christian, J.R. (Eds.) 2007. Guide to best practices for ocean CO2 measurements. PICES Special Publication 3, 191 pp. |
Researcher name: | Lisa Miller |
Researcher institution: | Institute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada |
CTD Temperature | |
---|---|
Abbreviation: | CTDTMP |
Unit: | degrees celcius |
Observation type: | CTD sensor |
Sampling instrument: | CTD |
Analyzing instrument: | CTD |
Quality flag convention: | WOCE quality control flags are used: 2 = good value, 3 = questionable value, 4 = bad value |
CTD Salinity | |
---|---|
Abbreviation: | CTDSAL |
Observation type: | CTD sensor |
Sampling instrument: | CTD |
Analyzing instrument: | CTD |
Quality flag convention: | WOCE quality control flags are used: 2 = good value, 3 = questionable value, 4 = bad value |
SUBMITTED BY: Lisa A. Miller (lisa.miller@dfo-mpo.gc.ca)
SUBMISSION DATE: 2020-03-24