Skip to main content

Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), total alkalinity and other hydrographic and chemical variables collected from discrete samples and profile observations during the R/V Thomas G. Thompson cruise TN249-10 (EXPOCODE 325020100509) in the Bering Sea from 2010-05-09 to 2010-06-14 (NCEI Accession 0189661)

INVESTIGATORS:
Jessica N. Cross ORCID logo - NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL)
Jeremy T. Mathis ORCID logo - University of Alaska Fairbanks
Phyllis J. Stabeno ORCID logo - NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL)
Calvin Mordy ORCID logo - NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL)

PACKAGE DESCRIPTION: This dataset includes discrete profile measurements of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), total alkalinity, temperature, salinity dissolved oxygen and nutrients during R/V Thomas G. Thompson cruise TN249-10 (EXPOCODE 325020100509) in the Bering Sea from 2010-05-09 to 2010-06-14. The cruise was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) for the Bering Sea Ecosystem Study-Bering Sea Integrated Ecosystem Research Program (BEST-BSIERP) and supported by numerous agencies and institutions. The CTD operations on the cruise were managed by personnel from NOAA/PMEL in the Eco FOCI program, with technical expertise from Scripps Institution of Oceanography personnel, and deployment assistance from Healy personnel.

CITE AS: Cross, Jessica N.; Mathis, Jeremy T.; Monacci, Natalie M.; Mordy, Calvin; Stabeno, Phyllis J.; Sullivan, Margaret E. (2019). Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), total alkalinity and other hydrographic and chemical variables collected from discrete samples and profile observations during the R/V Thomas G. Thompson cruise TN249-10 (EXPOCODE 325020100509) in the Bering Sea from 2010-05-09 to 2010-06-14 (NCEI Accession 0189661). [indicate subset used]. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25921/kjhg-2n93. Accessed [date].


DATA PACKAGES RELATED TO THIS ONE:
IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION FOR THIS DATA PACKAGE:
NCEI ACCESSION: 0189661
NCEI DOI: https://doi.org/10.25921/kjhg-2n93
EXPOCODE: 325020100509;
CRUISE ID: TN249-10;
SECTION/LEG: Chukchi Sea, Bering Sea;

TYPES OF STUDY:
Discrete measurement;

TEMPORAL COVERAGE:
START DATE: 2010-05-09
END DATE: 2010-06-14

SPATIAL COVERAGE:
NORTH: 59.91
WEST: -179.44
EAST: -163.28
SOUTH: 56.3

GEOGRAPHIC NAMES:
Bering Sea;North Pacific Ocean;

PLATFORMS:
R/V Thomas G. Thompson (ID: 3250);

RESEARCH PROJECT(S):
none;


VARIABLES / PARAMETERS:

Dissolved Inorganic Carbon
Abbreviation: TCARBN
Unit: UMOL/KG
Observation type: Discrete, bottle
Measured or calculated: Measured
Sampling instrument: Niskin Bottles
Analyzing instrument: Discrete samples were run on a VINDTA 3C
Detailed sampling and analyzing information: The Versatile INstrument for the Determination of Total inorganic and titration of Alkalinity (VINDTA) by Marianda paired with a Coulometer by UIC was used to conduct a coulomteric carbon dioxide titration with a carrier gas and a potentiometric alkalinity titration with an open cell.
Standardization description: The samples were standardized using Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) provided by Dr. A. Dickson of Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Standardization frequency: Daily
CRM manufacturer: Andrew Dickson Laboratory at SIO
CRM batch number: 94-99
Preservation method: Mercuric chloride solution
Preservative volume: 200 μL
Uncertainty: 4 μmol kg-1
Quality flag convention: WOCE quality control flags are used: 2 = good value, 3 = questionable value, 4 = bad value
Method reference: Mathis, J. T., Cross, J. N., Bates, N. R., Bradley Moran, S., Lomas, M. W., Mordy, C. W., and Stabeno, P. J. 2010. Seasonal distribution of dissolved inorganic carbon and net community production on the Bering Sea shelf, Biogeosciences, 7, 1769-1787, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1769-2010.
Researcher name: Jessica N. Cross
Researcher institution: University of Alaska Fairbanks
Total alkalinity
Abbreviation: ALKALI
Unit: UMOL/KG
Observation type: Discrete, bottle
Measured or calculated: Measured
Sampling instrument: Niskin Bottles
Analyzing instrument: Discrete samples were run on a VINDTA 3C
Type of titration: Potentiometric
Cell type (open or closed): Open
Curve fitting method: GRAN plot
Detailed sampling and analyzing information: The Versatile INstrument for the Determination of Total inorganic and titration of Alkalinity (VINDTA) by Marianda paired with a Coulometer by UIC was used to conduct a coulomteric carbon dioxide titration with a carrier gas and a potentiometric alkalinity titration with an open cell.
Replicate information: Duplicates samples from the same niskin were measured at each station, 12.6% of samples. The absolute standard deviations of duplicates were 0.85 umol/kg and 1.68 umol/kg for the two titration cells.
Standardization description: The samples were standardized using Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) provided by Dr. A. Dickson of Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Standardization frequency: Daily
CRM manufacturer: Certified Reference Material (Dr. Andrew Dickson, Marine Physical Laboratory, La Jolla, California)
CRM batch number: CRM batch 94-99
Preservation method: Mercuric chloride
Preservative volume: 200 μL
Uncertainty: 4 μmol/kg
Quality flag convention: WOCE quality control flags are used: 2 = good value, 3 = questionable value, 4 = bad value
Method reference: Mathis, J. T., Cross, J. N., Bates, N. R., Bradley Moran, S., Lomas, M. W., Mordy, C. W., and Stabeno, P. J. 2010. Seasonal distribution of dissolved inorganic carbon and net community production on the Bering Sea shelf, Biogeosciences, 7, 1769-1787, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1769-2010.
Researcher name: Jessica N. Cross
Researcher institution: University of Alaska Fairbanks
CTD Temperature
Abbreviation: CTDTMP
Unit: degrees celcius
Observation type: CTD sensor
Sampling instrument: CTD
Analyzing instrument: CTD
Detailed sampling and analyzing information: A profiling CTD 911 was used to collect the conductivity, temperature, and depth data at each station. Data are processed using Seabird CTD software and calibration file. Post-processing at the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory includes filtering extreme outliers, extrapolation of values from the top value collected at ~3-5m to the surface. Each cast is visually reviewed for reasonableness and density inversions (greater than 0.02 sigma-t) caused by spurious measurements. This process is facilitated by comparison of the outputs of the 2 temperature and conductivity sensors. Profile data are bin-averaged to 1 meter.
Uncertainty: 0.001 DEG C
Quality flag convention: WOCE quality control flags are used: 2 = good value, 3 = questionable value, 4 = bad value
Researcher name: Phyllis J. Stabeno
Researcher institution: NOAA/PMEL
CTD Salinity
Abbreviation: CTDSAL
Observation type: CTD sensor
Sampling instrument: CTD
Analyzing instrument: CTD
Detailed sampling and analyzing information: A profiling CTD 911 was used to collect the conductivity, temperature, and depth data at each station. Data are processed using Seabird CTD software and calibration file. Post-processing at the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory includes filtering extreme outliers, extrapolation of values from the top value collected at ~3-5m to the surface. Each cast is visually reviewed for reasonableness and density inversions (greater than 0.02 sigma-t) caused by spurious measurements. This process is facilitated by comparison of the outputs of the 2 temperature and conductivity sensors. Profile data are bin-averaged to 1 meter.
Uncertainty: 0.003
Quality flag convention: WOCE quality control flags are used: 2 = good value, 3 = questionable value, 4 = bad value
Researcher name: Phyllis J. Stabeno
Researcher institution: NOAA/PMEL
Nutrients
Abbreviation: SILCAT, NITRAT, NITRIT PHSPHT
Unit: UMOL/KG
Observation type: Bottle, discrete
Sampling instrument: CTD Niskin Bottles
Analyzing instrument: Discrete samples were run on a continuous flow analyzer.
Detailed sampling and analyzing information: Samples were collected in 50 ml high-density polyethylene bottles that were rinsed first with 10% HCl prior to each station, and rinsed at least three times with sample before filling. Some samples were refrigerated for 3-12 hours prior to analysis. Nutrient samples were analyzed according to the methods of Gordon, et al (1993). Ammonium was measured using an indophenol blue method modified from Mantoura and Woodward (1983).
Replicate information: In a direct comparison of EcoFOCI and BASIS methods, replicate frozen samples from the Bering Sea were analyzed with each method and found to be within 0.5 μM nitrate, 0.04 μM nitrite, and 0.7 μM ammonium (SD, n = 13).
Quality flag convention: WOCE quality control flags are used: 2 = good value, 3 = questionable value, 4 = bad value
Method reference: Gordon, I., Jennings, J.C., Ross, J.A., Krest, J. 1993. A Suggested Protocol for Continuous Flow Automated Analysis of Seawater Nutrients (Phosphate, Nitrate, Nitrite and Silicic Acid) in the WOCE Hydrographic Program and the Joint Global Ocean Fluxes Study. Methods Manual WHPO. 91-1. Mantoura, R.F.C., Woodward, E.M.S., 1983. Optimization of the indophenol blue method for the automated determination of ammonia in estuarine waters. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 17, 219-224.
Researcher name: Calvin Mordy
Researcher institution: NOAA/PMEL
Dissolved Oxygen
Abbreviation: OXYGEN
Unit: UMOL/KG
Observation type: Bottle, discrete
Sampling instrument: CTD Niskin Bottles
Analyzing instrument: SBE 43
Detailed sampling and analyzing information: A profiling CTD 911 was used to collect the conductivity, temperature, and depth data at each station. A SBE 43 sensor was plumbed in to the 911 to measure dissolved oxygen. Data are processed using Seabird CTD software and calibration file. Post-processing at the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory includes filtering extreme outliers, extrapolation of values from the top value collected at ~3-5m to the surface. Each cast is visually reviewed for reasonableness and density inversions (greater than 0.02 sigma-t) caused by spurious measurements. This process is facilitated by comparison of the outputs of the 2 temperature and conductivity sensors. Profile data are bin-averaged to 1 meter.
Uncertainty: 1 UMOL/KG
Quality flag convention: WOCE quality control flags are used: 2 = good value, 3 = questionable value, 4 = bad value
Method reference: Gordon, I., Jennings, J.C., Ross, J.A., Krest, J. 1993. A Suggested Protocol for Continuous Flow Automated Analysis of Seawater Nutrients (Phosphate, Nitrate, Nitrite and Silicic Acid) in the WOCE Hydrographic Program and the Joint Global Ocean Fluxes Study. Methods Manual WHPO. 91-1. Mantoura, R.F.C., Woodward, E.M.S., 1983. Optimization of the indophenol blue method for the automated determination of ammonia in estuarine waters. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 17, 219-224.
Researcher name: Calvin Mordy
Researcher institution: NOAA/PMEL
Ammonium
Abbreviation: NH4
Unit: UMOL/KG
Observation type: Bottle, discrete
Sampling instrument: CTD Niskin Bottles
Analyzing instrument: Discrete samples were run on a continuous flow analyzer.
Detailed sampling and analyzing information: Samples were collected in 50 ml high-density polyethylene bottles that were rinsed first with 10% HCl prior to each station, and rinsed at least three times with sample before filling. Some samples were refrigerated for 3-12 hours prior to analysis. Nutrient samples were analyzed according to the methods of Gordon, et al (1993). Ammonium was measured using an indophenol blue method modified from Mantoura and Woodward (1983).
Replicate information: In a direct comparison of EcoFOCI and BASIS methods, replicate frozen samples from the Bering Sea were analyzed with each method and found to be within 0.5 μM nitrate, 0.04 μM nitrite, and 0.7 μM ammonium (SD, n = 13).
Quality flag convention: WOCE quality control flags are used: 2 = good value, 3 = questionable value, 4 = bad value
Method reference: Gordon, I., Jennings, J.C., Ross, J.A., Krest, J. 1993. A Suggested Protocol for Continuous Flow Automated Analysis of Seawater Nutrients (Phosphate, Nitrate, Nitrite and Silicic Acid) in the WOCE Hydrographic Program and the Joint Global Ocean Fluxes Study. Methods Manual WHPO. 91-1. Mantoura, R.F.C., Woodward, E.M.S., 1983. Optimization of the indophenol blue method for the automated determination of ammonia in estuarine waters. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 17, 219-224.
Researcher name: Calvin Mordy
Researcher institution: NOAA/PMEL

PUBLICATIONS DESCRIBING THIS DATASET:
Cross, J.N., Mathis, J.T., Bates, N.R., Byrne, R.H. 2013. Conservative and non-conservative variations of total alkalinity on the southeastern Bering Sea shelf. Marine Chemistry 154, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2013.05.012
Cross, J.N., Mathis, J.T., Lomas, M.W., Moran, S.B., Baumann, M.S., Shull, D.H., Mordy, C.W., Ostendorf, M.L., Bates, N.R., Stabeno, P.J., Grebmeier, J.M. 2014. Integrated assessment of the carbon budget in the southeastern Bering Sea. Deep-Sea Research II 109 112-124 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.03.003
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Supplemental data for the BEST-BSIERP can be found at http://beringsea.eol.ucar.edu/data/ and https://data.eol.ucar.edu/dataset/102.142
FUNDING AGENCY:
National Science Foundation
PROJECT TITLE: Collaborative Research: BEST - A Service Proposal to Examine Impacts of Sea-ice on Hydrographic Structure and Nutrients over the Eastern Bering Sea Shelf
PROJECT ID: 732430

SUBMITTED BY: Robert M. Key (key@princeton.edu)

SUBMISSION DATE: 2019-06-04

REVISION DATE: 2020-11-20

PREVIOUS VERSIONS: Version 1.1