The charts in this directory are a comparison between USB, MK9 and NAVY
XBT aquisition with CTD where all synchronised deployments resulted in 
entirely good quality profiles from all three systems.

The following commands were used in MATLAB to adjust the vertical scale 
of each profile to align it with the CTD near surface.

 xbtCompare('fr020419004', 'drop011', 'drop009', 'td_00008', 5, 2, 2)
 xbtCompare('fr020419004', 'drop012', 'drop010', 'td_00009', 3, 3, 3)
 xbtCompare('fr020419005', 'drop015', 'drop013', 'td_00010', 3, 3, 2)
 xbtCompare('fr020419005', 'drop017', 'drop014', 'td_00011', 2, 3, 2)
 xbtCompare('fr020419006', 'drop018', 'drop015', 'td_00012', 2, 2, 1)
 xbtCompare('fr020419006', 'drop019', 'drop016', 'td_00013', 2, 1, 2)
 xbtCompare('fr020419010', 'drop031', 'drop027', 'td_00024', 3, 4, 2)
 xbtCompare('fr020419014', 'drop050', 'drop036', 'td_00034', 4, 4, 3)
 xbtCompare('fr020419016', 'drop057', 'drop043', 'td_00042', 4, 4, 4)