2.0 Definition
Dugdale and Goering (1967) define new
production, described here as nitrate uptake, as “...all primary production
associated with newly available nitrogen, for example NO3 -N
and N2 -N...”. Dinitrogen fixation (N2-N) has conventionally
been viewed as a minor source of nitrogen uptake in ocean waters 1 , therefore,
only NO3-N will be considered here. In view of the importance,
conceptually and operationally, of differentiating nitrate uptake and uptake
of regenerated forms of nitrogen, it is strongly recommended that regenerated
production measurements (NH4 + uptake, as a minimum) be made
in parallel with nitrate uptake measurements.
NO3 -N= nmol L-1 day -1
3.0 Principle of Analysis
The measurement of nitrate uptake, as
defined above, is based on the incorporation of ‘trace’ additions of 15
N-labelled NO3 into phytoplankton during incubation experiments,
similar in principle to the 14 CO2 method for measuring photosynthesis.
4.0 Apparatus
Determination of nitrate uptake rates
requires knowledge of: (i) the initial substrate (NO3 -
) concentration, (ii) the final concentration of particulate nitrogen and
(iii) the final 15N enrichment of the particulate matter.
For determining substrate concentrations
>100 nmol L -1 , refer to Chapter 8, “The Determination of Nitrite,
Nitrate + Nitrite, Orthophosphate and Reactive Silicate in Sea Water using
Continuous Flow Analysis”. For concentrations <100 nmol L -1
, Chapter 9, “The Determination of Nitrate in Sea Water”1 . For particulate
nitrogen, refer to Chapter 15, “Determination of Particulate Organic Carbon
and Particulate Nitrogen”2 .
15 N enrichment is measured by either emission or mass spectrometry. Generally, the emission spectrometer has the capability of analyzing smaller samples but at the expense of precision and accuracy (Fiedler and Proksch, 1975). Newer mass spectrometers, however, can now match the emission spectrometer in the analysis of small masses of N while retaining their superior analytical precision (Owens and Rees, 1989).
5.0 Reagents
15 N-enriched NO3 , as NaNO3
or KNO3 , is commercially available in dry chemical form at
enrichments of 95-99 atom%. Tracer working solutions are made up in distilled/demineralized
water. 15 NH4 is available at similar enrichments
as NH4Cl or (NH4 )2 SO4 .
6.0 Sampling
Sampling protocols will generally follow
those outlined in Chapter 19, “Primary Production by 14 C”.
Sampling depths should be compatible to the extent possible with depths
selected for 14C experiments 3 but additional depths are recommended
below the 1% light depth to assess the ‘sub-euphotic zone’ uptake of 15NO3
- (and 15NH4+ ).
7.0 Procedures
7.1 Experimentation should be done a minimum
of twice daily, once during daylight hours and once during darkness, because
N uptake may not be fully light dependant and because bacterioplankton
contribute to both NH 4 + and NO3 - utilization.
7.2 Tracer additions: 15 NO3 - and 15NH 4 + should be added at ~10% (or less) of ambient concentration where measurable. For waters where ambient concentrations are below the analytical limit of detection, tracer additions should be at the limit of detection, i.e. ~50 nmol L -1 when conventional nutrient analysis is employed or ~2 nmol L -1 when the new low-level methods are used.
7.3 Incubations: Incubations of 2-4 hr in light-attenuated deck boxes, cooled by flowing surface seawater, are recommended. Surface seawater temperature may be inappropriate for deeper samples where the subsurface chl max is situated within or below the thermocline. Other arrangements for temperature control during the on-deck measurements of “sub-euphotic zone” uptake will be necessary. Acid-cleaned polycarbonate bottles are to be used (see Chapter 19 for bottle washing technique). Extreme caution should be exercised in the use of nitric acid as originally described in the metal-free ‘clean’ techniques of Fitzwater et al. (1982); copious distilled water rinsing is necessary to insure no residual contamination (NO3 - ). Dilute HCl has been employed as an effective substitute, avoiding the nitrogen contaminant problem (HOTS, 1990; BATS, 1991).
7.4 Filtration/storage: After incubation, samples are filtered onto Whatman GF/F glass fiber filters under low vacuum pressure (<70mm Hg) and rinsed with filtered seawater to remove residual 15NO3 - from filter interstices. Care should be taken not to evacuate the filters to dryness (Goldman and Dennett, 1985). Filters are then immediately dried or frozen at -20oC (and later dried) for isotope analysis.
7.5 Isotope analysis: Under most circumstances, particulates are converted to N2 gas by the Dumas combustion method. Isotope ratios are determined either by optical emission spectrometry or by mass spectrometry (Fiedler and Proksch, 1975).
8.0 Calculation and Expression of Results
Nitrate uptake (nmol L-1 t
-1 ) = ( 15 Nxs * PNt ) / (15 Nenr * t)
where:
t = incubation time in hours
15
Nxs = excess 15N (measured 15Nminus 15N
natural abundance, 0.366 atom%) in the post-incubation particulate sample
PNt = particulate nitrogen content of the sample after incubation in units
of nmol L -1
15 Nenr = 15N enrichment in the dissolved fraction:
15 Nenr = [(100 * 15 N)/(15 N + 14
N)]-15Nn
where:
15N = concentration of labelled N, nmol L -1
14 N = concentration (same units) of unlabeled N
15 Nn = natural abundance of 15N
Daily (24 hr) nitrate uptake rates (nmol
L-1 d -1 )are approximated by multiplying the results
from the daylight incubations by the number of daylight hrs (the same for
the dark incubations and hrs) and adding the two quantities. The procedure
of combining the independent “light” and “dark” period uptake measurements
is valid only if one is sampling essentially the same water mass at both
times. Otherwise, the estimated
rates must be normalized (for example,
to the chlorophyll level) before combining the rates to come up with a
daily rate.
9.0 Quality Control
Sample collection and handling should
follow the general precautions outlined for other incubation measurements,
e.g. ‘clean’ techniques should be employed to minimize metal contamination,
exposure of samples during transport to and from incubators to direct sunlight
should be avoided to minimize light shock. Additionally, sources of potential
nitrogen contamination (e.g. smoking) should be avoided in sample handling,
filtration and isotope analysis.
Emission spectra are generally calibrated using commercial N 2 gas standards of known isotope ratios; mass spectra are generally calibrated using commercial standard reference material (NBS, NIST) as primary standards or locally prepared secondary standards which have been calibrated against the primary standards. Under these circumstances, mass spectrometer accuracy should be absolute. Accuracy of emission spectra, however, is problematic since operational samples are not purified gases as are the commercial standards supplied with the instrument. Periodic calibration against a mass spectrometer, therefore, is required. Precision for mass spectrometers should be +/- 0.005 at natural 15 N abundance level (0.366 atom%); the value is +/- 0.02 for emission spectrometers. Replicate incubations for 15 N uptake rates should fall within 5% of the mean (McCarthy et al. 1977).
10.0 Intercomparison
Intercomparison is desirable but not essential
for 15 N ratio analysis since most instrumentation is calibrated
against known commercial standard reference materials, e.g. NBS, NIST standards.
Sample collection / incubation particulars, however, are likely to differ,
making intercomparisons of the actual nitrate uptake measurements (sample
collection/incubation/analysis) on the same water mass by the various researchers
highly desirable and to be recommended whenever possible.
11.0 Parameters
Attention has recently been drawn to the
need for JGOFS researchers to make a clear distinction between “variables”
and “parameters” in process studies (Evans, 1991). With regard to nitrate
uptake (and nitrogen utilization in general), daily column-integrated N-fluxes
as described above are considered ‘variables’. Parameters of relevance
to nitrate uptake fall into three categories: those describing the nitrogen
concentration-dependence of uptake, i.e. K s and V max , similar parameters
describing the light-dependence of uptake, i.e. K i , V max
, V dark , and a parameter describing N interactions, specifically
the inhibitory effects of NH4+ on NO3
- uptake. Consideration of the appropriate measurement protocols
for these ‘parameters’ is beyond the scope of this report but is judged
of some urgency.
12.0 References
BATS (1991). Bermuda Atlantic Time-Series
Study. Field and laboratory methods, 2nd edition, March, 1991, Bermuda
Biological Station for Research, Inc.
Brzezinski, M.A. (1987). Colorimetric
determination of nanomolar concentrations of ammonium in seawater using
solvent extraction. Mar. Chem. 20: 277-288.
Carpenter, E.J. and K. Romans (1991).
Major role of the cyanobacterium Trichodesmium in nutrient cycling in the
North Atlantic Ocean. Science 254: 1356-1358.
Dugdale, R.C. and F.P. Wilkerson (1986).
The use of 15 N to measure nitrogen uptake in euphotic oceans; experimental
considerations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31:673-689.
Dugdale, R.C. and J.J. Goering (1967).
Uptake of new and regenerated forms of nitrogen in primary productivity.
Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 196-206.
Evans, G.T. (1991). On parameters and
variables. U.S. JGOFS News 2(4): 6.
Fiedler, R. and G. Proksch (1975). The
determination of nitrogen- 15 by emission and mass spectrometry in biochemical
analysis: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 17: 1-62.
Fitzwater, S.E., G.A. Knauer and J.H.
Martin (1982). Metal contamination and its effects on primary production
measurements. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27: 544-551.
Garside, C. (1982). A chemiluminescent
technique for the determination of nanomolar concentrations of nitrate
and nitrite, or nitrite alone in seawater. Mar. Chem. 11: 159-167.
Goldman, J.C. and M.R. Dennett (1985).
Susceptibility of some marine phytoplankton species to cell breakage during
filtration and post- filtration rinsing. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 86: 47-58.
HOTS (1990). Hawaii Ocean Time-series
Program. Field and laboratory protocols, September, 1990. University of
Hawaii.
Jones, R.D. (1991). An improved fluorescence
method for the determination of nanomolar concentrations of ammonium in
natural waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36: 814-819.
Laws, E. A., G.R. DiTullio, P.R. Betzer,
D.M. Karl and K.L Carder (1989). Autotrophic production and elemental fluxes
at 26 o N, 155 o W in the North Pacific subtropical gyre. Deep-Sea Res.
36: 103-120.
Lohrenz, S. E., D. A. Wiesenburg, C. R.
Rein, R. A. Arnone, C. T. Taylor, G. A. Knauer, and A. H. Knap (1992).
A comparison of in situ and simulated in situ methods for estimating oceanic
primary production. J. Plankt. Res. 14: 201-221.
McCarthy, J.J., W.R. Taylor and J.L. Taft
(1977). Nitrogenous nutrition of the plankton in Chesapeake Bay. 1. Nutrient
availability and phytoplankton preferences. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22:996-1011.
Owens, N.J.P., and A.P. Rees (1989). Determination
of nitrogen-15 at sub-microgram levels of nitrogen using automated continuous-flow
isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Analyst 114: 1655-1657.
Raimbault, P., G. Slawyk, B. Coste and
J. Fry (1990). On the feasibility of using an automated colorimetric procedure
for the determination of seawater nitrate in the 0- 100 nM range: examples
from field and culture work. Mar. Biol. 104: 347-351.
Smith, S.L., K. Banse, J.K. Cochran, L.A.
Codispoti, H.W. Ducklow, M.E. Luther, D.B. Olson, W.T. Peterson, W.L. Prell,
N. Surgi, J.C. Swallow and K. Wishner (1991). U.S.JGOFS: Arabian Sea Process
Study, U.S. JGOFS Planning Report No. 13, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution,
Woods Hole, Mass., 164 p.