24 July 2002 Carla Forgy assigned accession # 0000753 to this data set. ---------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Problems in data set & Data request Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 11:06:34 +0000 From: phil mele To: ricardo@nodc.noaa.gov Ricardo Locarnini wrote: > > Hello Phil, > > I was about to write you today, but let's address first your queries > (But, please, read my request at the end of the message). > . . . > > Now to my request. In late 1999/early 2000 you submitted the CTD data > for the DOVETAIL 97 cruise, August-September 1997. These data, from 97 > CTD casts, were archived under NODC accession # 9900243, cruise > 32-10090. Your messages for this submission indicate that the bottle > data were not ready then, and that they will be submitted at a later > date. Were the bottle data submitted? If yes, I will find them here > and process them, because they have not been archived. If not, I would > sincerely appreciate if you could forward them. There is no hurry, as > we are still finishing the details of the new database release, but I > noticed today these data were missing from our database, and I thought > to write you before I forget about them. > > Best wishes, > > Ricardo > > -- > Ricardo A. Locarnini > NOAA/National Oceanographic Data Center > Ocean Climate Laboratory E/OC5 > 1315 East-West Highway > Silver Spring, Maryland 20910-3282 > > www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5 > 1-301-713-3290 x 209 (Office) > 1-301-713-3303 (Fax) ricardo - please find in my ftp site a gzipped tar file,dtb.tar.gz, of the dovetail 97 bottle data. ftp://ftp.ldeo.columbia.edu/pub/pmele/trans/ pr, te and sa are CTD data. rs, ro f1 (freon 11), f2 (freon 12) and f3 (freon 113) are bottle data. rn is record/bottle number Arnold Gordon is PI for all except fN. Bill Smethie (W. Smethie to NODC) is the PI for the freon data sorry to take so long. phil ------- B3206 1 1 -57.5007 -44.9915 1997/08/04 216 12:09 DT97 &zc:3090 zm:10 @pr te sa rs ro f1 f2 f3 rn 1436.7 0.8263 34.702 34.702 4.916 0.314 0.155 0.028 24 1435.5 0.8262 34.7021 34.702 4.912 0.313 0.158 0.03 23 1436.6 0.8262 34.7022 34.702 4.911 0.316 0.16 0.027 21 1435 0.826 34.7022 34.702 4.92 0.313 0.157 0.024 20 1436.4 0.8264 34.7019 34.705 4.921 0.312 0.11 0.022 19 1436.4 0.826 34.7022 34.706 4.903 0.309 0.12 0.03 18 1435.7 0.8265 34.7021 34.708 4.911 0.313 0.156 0.026 17 1436.5 0.8265 34.7021 34.706 4.908 0.315 0.153 0.029 16 1436 0.8267 34.7021 34.706 4.91 0.314 0.153 0.027 15 1436.3 0.827 34.7021 34.71 4.903 0.315 0.152 0.025 14 1436.6 0.8272 34.702 34.701 4.935 0.314 0.153 0.022 13 1436.1 0.8269 34.7022 34.698 4.914 0.313 0.156 0.028 12 1436.8 0.827 34.7019 34.701 4.906 0.311 0.151 0.027 11 1436.1 0.827 34.7022 34.7 4.873 0.312 0.152 0.028 10 1437 0.8267 34.7019 34.699 4.902 0.31 0.081 0.026 9 1436.3 0.8272 34.7023 34.699 4.872 0.313 0.157 0.024 8 1437 0.8263 34.7018 34.698 4.871 0.314 0.133 0.023 7 1436.9 0.8263 34.702 34.699 4.887 0.311 0.119 0.023 6 1436.9 0.8266 34.7021 34.698 4.912 0.311 0.109 0.025 5 1436.9 0.8269 34.7021 34.701 4.993 0.307 0.151 0.022 4 1437.4 0.8266 34.7021 34.706 -9 0.309 0.138 0.028 3 1436.9 0.8251 34.7018 34.705 4.944 0.317 0.156 0.023 2 1436.7 0.825 34.7022 34.704 -9 0.308 0.13 0.024 1 ------- Subject: Re: Problems in data set & Data request Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 09:27:28 +0000 From: phil mele To: ricardo@nodc.noaa.gov Ricardo Locarnini wrote: > > Hello Phil, > > Thanks for the DOVETAIL 97 bottle data. The NODC accession number for > this data set is 0000753. > > Just to make sure: bottle stations are numbered from 1 to 97, but there > are only 91 bottle stations for DT97. Does this sound right? > > Best, > > Ricardo yes, we did not take bottles on all stations, we skipped a few. phil Subject: Re: Oxygen methods in DT97 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 15:21:12 -0400 From: phil mele To: ricardo@nodc.noaa.gov for stations 1-7, the oxygen titration was amperometric. for stations 12-end, photometric (no bottles for 8-11) phil > > Hello Phil, > > the documentation that came with the DT97 CTD data submission indicates > that the oxygen titrations on the water samples "were initially done on > a Lamont automated titrator" and later "the ASA optical endpoint > titrator was set up and used". We have different oxygen methods codes > for automated titration, amperometric (code 303) and for automated > titration, photometric (code 304): > > a) Was the "Lamont automated titrator" amperometric or photometric? > b) If it was amperometic, and assuming that the ASA method described is > photometric, When did the change from one to the other occur? > > Many thanks in advance for any information you could provide on these > questions, > > Ricardo