Subject: Re: Times for Helicopter CTD's Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 10:39:13 -0400 (EDT) From: phil mele To: ricardo@nodc.noaa.gov ok, here we go again: C3299 34 1 -65.7918 -56.0372 1992/06/07 153 13:36 ISW C3299 35 1 -65.7903 -55.4835 1992/06/07 153 14:26 ISW C3299 36 1 -65.7918 -54.9920 1992/06/07 153 15:43 ISW C3299 37 1 -65.7922 -54.7433 1992/06/07 153 16:35 ISW thanks so much - phil >Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 09:08:14 -0400 >From: Ricardo Locarnini >To: pmele@ldeo.columbia.edu >Subject: Times for Helicopter CTD's > >Hello Phil: > >this is of very small importance, but maybe you have more info. The >last four helicopter CTD's from ISW-1, stations 34 to 37, have assigned >the same date and time. > >By the way, What did you decide to do w/ the AARI CTD dataset from the >Ice Camp? I promise that there would no documentation associating it w/ >you or LDEO. Otherwise, it seems the data in the LDEO data report will >be electronically scanned here at OCL. > >Best, > >Ricardo Subject: Re: ISW-1 Rotation - Query Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 15:46:48 -0400 (EDT) From: phil mele To: ricardo@nodc.noaa.gov ricardo - this is embarrassing. most of the times are off. here are the correct times: C3206 1 1 -67.0775 -48.4647 1992/05/05 126 03:32 NP92-1 C3206 2 1 -66.6289 -49.2381 1992/05/06 127 02:44 NP92-1 C3206 3 1 -65.8762 -51.3432 1992/05/07 128 00:46 NP92-1 C3206 4 1 -65.5857 -51.2225 1992/05/07 128 23:48 NP92-1 C3206 5 1 -65.1265 -51.4535 1992/05/09 130 00:29 NP92-1 C3206 6 1 -64.7057 -52.4057 1992/05/09 130 23:13 NP92-1 C3206 7 1 -64.4557 -52.3150 1992/05/10 131 23:11 NP92-1 C3206 8 1 -64.0368 -52.2558 1992/05/12 133 00:11 NP92-1 phil ps - i have other stuff for you in the queue. patience please. >Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 13:15:00 -0400 >From: Ricardo Locarnini >To: pmele@ldeo.columbia.edu, bhuber@ldeo.columbia.edu, claudiag@ldeo.columbia.edu >Subject: ISW-1 Rotation - Query > >Hello: > >I would sincerely appreciate if you could check the recorded dates, >times, and locations for the eight CTD stations occupied aboard the >Nathaniel B. Palmer during the ISW-1 Rotation cruise. I am attaching to >this message the cruise report I produced for these stations based on >the data submitted by LDEO. There seems to be something odd in the >header info provided around stations 4 and 6 which results in strange >ship speeds and a break in the consecutive station numbers when ordered >by time. I checked TR LDEO-94-2, but that lists the same info. > >Best wishes, > >Ricardo > >-- >Ricardo A. Locarnini >NOAA/National Oceanographic Data Center >Ocean Climate Laboratory E/OC5 >1315 East-West Highway >Silver Spring, Maryland 20910-3282 > >www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5 >1-301-713-3290 x 209 (Office) >1-301-713-3303 (Fax) ------- DATA ADDED TO SUBMITTED DATA SET - 17 April 2001 Files aq92.001 and aq92.002 typed by R.A.Locarnini from technical report LDEO-94-2 on 17 April 2001. ------- Subject: Re: ISW data Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:01:57 -0400 (EDT) From: phil mele To: ricardo@nodc.noaa.gov ricardo - the isw data is in my ftp site, a sun tar file that has been gzipped, name: isw.tar.gz ftp://ftp.ldeo.columbia.edu/pub/pmele/trans/ there are 234 files. CTD data from the fedorov (aq92), ISW camp (isw), ISW helicopter (iswh), palmer 92/1 (nbp921) and palmer 92/2 (nbp922). bottle data for all except aq92 and nbp921. take a look and let me know if you can make sense of it. phil Subject: Re: ISW data Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:46:32 -0500 (EST) From: phil mele To: ricardo@nodc.noaa.gov ricardo - wow. great data set. i will get on it and send it in. here is what you will get. 68 CTD (seabird microcat) from the station called: camp. 60 of these stations have bottle data. 37 CTD (seabird microcat) from helo stations called: helo. 21 of these stations have bottles. 8 CTD stations with bottles from the federov collected by us called: aq92. two sets from the palmer. 8 CTD station with no bottles called nbp921. 17 CTD stations with bottles called nbp922. the file you sent looks like the bottle files from the federov. i don't recall exactly what the russians/soviets collected, just that the quality was so poor we never used it. i must admit i don't even think we have a copy anymore as it was useless. phil Subject: Re: AARI CTD data Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:18:16 -0500 (EST) From: phil mele To: ricardo@nodc.noaa.gov ricardo - your email prompted me to look, and we do have them. i can include them with the data i send, but would prefer that the data not be associated with lamont or myself in any documentation. there are 88 files, stations numbered 2-91 with two stations having two casts. phil >Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 12:22:49 -0500 >From: Ricardo Locarnini >To: pmele@ldeo.columbia.edu >Subject: ISW data > >Hello Phil: > >I reckon I will need your help again. A few weeks ago, I noticed that >most of the data collected during Ice Station Weddell have never made it >into the NODC archives. As my copy of the data report clearly says that >the data were submitted to NODC, we checked the NODC backlogs and found >some data belonging to ISW under NODC accession number 9500052. For >some reason, these data were never processed and archived. Considering >the importance of these data and the effort and sacrifice it took to >collect them, I am trying to solve this problem. > >Most of the data under accession 9500052 are bottle data separated as >AQ, Camp, Helo, and NBP. Only 8 (eight) CTD profiles for NBP are >present in the NODC backlogs; we do not seem to have the CTD data for >any of the other components of ISW, including the AARI CTD from ISW Ice >Camp which appear at the end of the data report. I would sincerely >appreciate if, at your convenience, you could prepare and put in your >ftp site the entire ISW data set, bottle and CTD. This is probably the >easiest way for me to make sure we will not miss anything. The >preferred format would be space separated data w/ a fixed format. > >The only data from ISW currently in the NODC archives are the 8 bottle >stations from AQ92. These data were received directly from AARI and >archived here a year ago. I am including in the attachment these data >as they seem to have more variables (Si, NO3, ... ) than show up in the >LDEO data report which you might want to have, although you seem to have >oxygen data that were not included in the AARI version for some >stations. I will see that your version completes what we already have. >The other reason I am including these data is that there seems to exist >a discrepancy between the vertical coordinate reported by AARI (depth) >and the one reported in the LDEO data report (pressure). Would you know >which one is correct? > >Many thanks in advance for your help, > >Ricardo